BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//linuxsoftware.nz//NONSGML Joyous v1.4//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Probing unification scenarios with Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
DTSTART:20251104T150000Z
DTEND:20251104T170000Z
DTSTAMP:20260804T190936Z
UID:726ffda2-4550-4d46-bd2b-f8c9af69e989
SEQUENCE:4
CREATED:20251027T095921Z
DESCRIPTION:Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) is an observational cornerstone
  of the Hot Big Bang model and a sensitive probe of physics beyond it. Alt
 hough some analytic approximations can be made\, a fully consistent analys
 is must be done numerically\, starting with the classic code by Kawano and
  leading to the recently developed PRyMordial\, a publicly available Pytho
 n code.An example of physics beyond the standard model to which BBN is sen
 sitive are Grand Unified Theory (GUT) models. A self-consistent perturbati
 ve analysis of the effects of variations in nature’s fundamental constan
 ts\, unavoidable in a broad class of GUT models\, has recently been develo
 ped\, and describes the relevant variations with only three parameters: (
 ∆α_EM)/α_EM \, R and S.The specific goal of this work is to implement 
 this perturbative approach in the PRyMordial code and use the extended cod
 e to obtain constraints on the variations of the abovementioned fundamenta
 l constants using current observations.Two different viable scenarios were
  found\, and the three parameters were constrained independently for both 
 cases. The variation of the gravitational coupling can be implemented by v
 arying either particle masses\, or Newton’s gravitational constant.With 
 the variation of masses\, we obtained a 1σ interval of [-4.89×10^(-5)\,5
 .22×10^(-5)] for (∆α_EM)/α_EM and a ratio S/R=2.53±0.06 correlating 
 with the observational values of Helium-4 and Deuterium abundances.For the
  variation of G_N\, we obtained one (R\,S) point (-1.52\,-6.06) that works
  best for any (∆α_EM)/α_EM \, constraining each of the three in a 1σ 
 interval: [-2.00×10^(-5)\,2.33×10^(-5) ] for ∆(∆α_EM)/α_EM \, [-15
 .7\,16.2] for R\, and [-127.3\,135.4] for S.
LAST-MODIFIED:20251027T115418Z
LOCATION:Sala P3\, Piso 1\, Pavilhão de Matemática\, Campus Alameda/Onli
 ne
URL:http://df.vps.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/pt/eventos/probing-unification-scenar
 ios-with-big-bang-nucleosynthesis/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p data-block-key="r8rlb">Big Bang Nucleosynt
 hesis (BBN) is an observational cornerstone of the Hot Big Bang model and 
 a sensitive probe of physics beyond it. Although some analytic approximati
 ons can be made\, a fully consistent analysis must be done numerically\, s
 tarting with the classic code by Kawano and leading to the recently develo
 ped PRyMordial\, a publicly available Python code.<br/><br/></p><p data-bl
 ock-key="3vgsb">An example of physics beyond the standard model to which B
 BN is sensitive are Grand Unified Theory (GUT) models. A self-consistent p
 erturbative analysis of the effects of variations in nature’s fundamenta
 l constants\, unavoidable in a broad class of GUT models\, has recently be
 en developed\, and describes the relevant variations with only three param
 eters: (∆α_EM)/α_EM \, R and S.<br/><br/></p><p data-block-key="346ii"
 >The specific goal of this work is to implement this perturbative approach
  in the PRyMordial code and use the extended code to obtain constraints on
  the variations of the abovementioned fundamental constants using current 
 observations.</p><p data-block-key="9l20l">Two different viable scenarios 
 were found\, and the three parameters were constrained independently for b
 oth cases. The variation of the gravitational coupling can be implemented 
 by varying either particle masses\, or Newton’s gravitational constant.<
 br/><br/></p><p data-block-key="6rtm9">With the variation of masses\, we o
 btained a 1σ interval of [-4.89×10^(-5)\,5.22×10^(-5)] for (∆α_EM)/
 α_EM and a ratio S/R=2.53±0.06 correlating with the observational values
  of Helium-4 and Deuterium abundances.</p><p data-block-key="c533e">For th
 e variation of G_N\, we obtained one (R\,S) point (-1.52\,-6.06) that work
 s best for any (∆α_EM)/α_EM \, constraining each of the three in a 1σ
  interval: [-2.00×10^(-5)\,2.33×10^(-5) ] for ∆(∆α_EM)/α_EM \, [-1
 5.7\,16.2] for R\, and [-127.3\,135.4] for S.</p><p data-block-key="1n4pl"
 ></p><p data-block-key="lijr"></p><p data-block-key="9mpka"><br/><br/></p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
