BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//linuxsoftware.nz//NONSGML Joyous v1.4//EN
BEGIN:VEVENT
SUMMARY:Testing the Geometry of the Universe with Curvature-Consistency Re
 lations
DTSTART:20260910T143000Z
DTEND:20260910T160000Z
DTSTAMP:20260916T104011Z
UID:6bb71d04-1bf2-434a-8329-dac151d9911d
SEQUENCE:2
CREATED:20260909T091610Z
DESCRIPTION:The Lambda cold dark matter (LCDM) cosmological model faces in
 creasingly significant and robust tensions among independent cosmological 
 measurements\, prompting renewed scrutiny of its foundational assumptions.
  While general relativity and the nature of dark energy are now routinely 
 tested with cosmological surveys\, less progress has been made testing the
  spacetime geometry at the largest scales\, and in particular testing the 
 assumption that observables (distances\, redshifts\, etc.) on the largest 
 scales are described by a single Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLR
 W) metric.This can however be done employing curvature-consistency tests. 
 Such tests utilize that spatial curvature within the FLRW metrics take a p
 articularly simple form\, which implies that certain constraint equations 
 for cosmological observables must be satisfied if the FLRW ansatz is indee
 d correct. In non-FLRW models\, these constraints are generally expected t
 o be violated\, but theoretical predictions for the signature of their vio
 lation in non-FLRW scenarios have been lacking in the literature.I will pr
 esent recent theoretical developments on curvature-consistency tests\, wit
 h focus on their signatures within physically motivated non-FLRW scenarios
 . In particular\, I will present smoking gun signatures for back reaction 
 universe models (where the large-scale expansion of the cosmology is diffe
 rent from FLRW) and the so-called Dyer-Roeder universes (where the optical
  properties of the cosmology deviate from the expectations of FLRW). I wil
 l finally comment on recent observational constraints of curvature-consist
 ency tests and their implications.
LAST-MODIFIED:20260909T091626Z
LOCATION:DF Seminar Room (2-8.3)\, 2nd floor of Physics Building
URL:http://df.vps.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/pt/eventos/testing-the-geometry-of-th
 e-universe-with-curvature-consistency-relations/
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p data-block-key="bu8lf">The Lambda cold dar
 k matter (LCDM) cosmological model faces increasingly significant and robu
 st tensions among independent cosmological measurements\, prompting renewe
 d scrutiny of its foundational assumptions. While general relativity and t
 he nature of dark energy are now routinely tested with cosmological survey
 s\, less progress has been made testing the spacetime geometry at the larg
 est scales\, and in particular testing the assumption that observables (di
 stances\, redshifts\, etc.) on the largest scales are described by a singl
 e Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric.<br/></p><p data-bloc
 k-key="3nta7">This can however be done employing curvature-consistency tes
 ts. Such tests utilize that spatial curvature within the FLRW metrics take
  a particularly simple form\, which implies that certain constraint equati
 ons for cosmological observables must be satisfied if the FLRW ansatz is i
 ndeed correct. In non-FLRW models\, these constraints are generally expect
 ed to be violated\, but theoretical predictions for the signature of their
  violation in non-FLRW scenarios have been lacking in the literature.<br/>
 </p><p data-block-key="9mqu6">I will present recent theoretical developmen
 ts on curvature-consistency tests\, with focus on their signatures within 
 physically motivated non-FLRW scenarios. In particular\, I will present sm
 oking gun signatures for back reaction universe models (where the large-sc
 ale expansion of the cosmology is different from FLRW) and the so-called D
 yer-Roeder universes (where the optical properties of the cosmology deviat
 e from the expectations of FLRW). I will finally comment on recent observa
 tional constraints of curvature-consistency tests and their implications.<
 /p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
